PaternityFraud.com exposes paternity fraud using DNA paternity tests

 

 
<< Previous    [1]  2  3    Next >>

 

Paternity Fraud

The Official on-line education center www.PaternityFraud.com for grassroots advocacy, legislative consulting, Pro Se support, DNA paternity testing resource for women and men affected by paternity fraud. Those women and men swindled should regain their constitutionally protected freedom and lawful assets.

This is the founding chapter of US Citizens Against Paternity Fraud (US-CAPF). We the people must express our voice and our vote whenever the law is wrong. Government serves the people, not enslaves the people for it's own monetary interests.

What about change to stop child support fraud?

 

Forcing a man to pay for other men's children that he is not willing to formally adopt can wreck his life. It can prevent him from supporting his own children and family. Paternity Fraud should be a criminal offense!

In other cases the honest mother, a married woman admits her husband is not the father, yet she is forced to lie by the court or child support enforcement agency to claim her husband is the father. Why? ANSWER: The marital presumption of paternity, even when the parties are separated.

 

 

Best interest, best lie or best cash cow? paternity fraud demands dna paternity testing 

There seems to be a logical basis in fact for the milkman statutes. While I do not support a return to 16th century common law where women and children were chattel, we cannot allow the continued deception of our opponents claiming the common law supported paternity fraud.

The true Lord Mansfield rule would NEVER cause a man to pay child support to an adulterous wife because the mother, the child and all property belonged to the husband. The duped dad would get custody of the child, but he would not pay any money nor assets to the adulterous wife for having another man's baby. Hmmm!

There has to be a flaw in rewarding a responsible adult for irresponsible behavior (cheating, getting pregnant and deceiving her husband). If this approach is acceptable to anyone with common sense, would there be a disagreement if wives were forced to pay husbands for doing the same irresponsible thing?

Let me spell it out, the husband is cheating, getting his mistress(es) pregnant and his wife has to pay him upon divorce because he wants child support and alimony. 

How many people would say that scenario is fair and righteous?

Carnell Smith Pf.V ~ The Advocate

<< Previous    [1]  2  3    Next >>

 

    

how to self represent, pro se, pro per