Paternity Fraud Center

The Official on-line center www.PaternityFraud.com for grass roots advocacy, legislative consulting, Pro Se support and DNA paternity testing resources for men and women affected by paternity fraud.

Welcome to the founding chapter of the International Citizens Against Paternity Fraud (I-CAPF) and U.S. Citizens Against Paternity Fraud (US-CAPF).

We the people, must express our voice and our votes whenever the law is unjust. The purpose of the American Government is to serve the people, not enslave the people for it's own monetary interests.

What about real change that prevents paternity fraud and stops child support fraud?

Forcing a man to pay for other men's children that he is not willing to formally adopt can wreck his life.

It can prevent a man from supporting his own children and family.

In other cases the honest mother is a married woman who admits her husband is not the father of her child, yet she is forced to lie by the courts and the child support enforcement agency to claim her husband is the father. Amazingly, while everyone knows that her is husband is not the father and he does NOT agree to formally adopt the child.

Why?

ANSWER: The marital presumption of paternity, even when the parties are separated (legal and non-legal), living across town, across the state and out-of-the-country. 

Best interest, best lie or best cash cow?  

There seems to be a logical basis in fact for the milkman statutes. While I do not support a return to 16th century common law where the women and children were chattel, we cannot allow the continued deception of our opponents to falsely claim that the English common law supported paternity fraud.

The true Lord Mansfield rule would NEVER cause a man to pay child support to an adulterous wife because the mother, the child and all property belonged to the husband. The duped dad would get custody of the child and he would not surrender any money nor assets to the adulterous wife for having an affair and another man's baby. Hmmm!

There has to be a flaw in a judicial or administrative system that rewards a responsible adult for irresponsible behavior.

If this approach is acceptable to anyone with common sense, there should be no disagreement if women were forced to reward men for doing the same irresponsible thing. Right?

For example, the husband cheats on his wife, impregnates his mistress and the couple divorces. Then his wife has to pay him for the other woman's child upon divorce because he wants child support, alimony and the matital home because the child needs a place to live. 

How many of us would say that the scenario described above is fair and just? And just try telling the ex-wife, it's her fault for not learning about his affair sooner.