Paternity Fraud Center
The Official on-line center www.PaternityFraud.com for grass roots
advocacy, legislative consulting, Pro Se support and DNA paternity testing resources for men and women
affected by paternity fraud.
Welcome to the founding chapter of the International Citizens Against
Paternity Fraud (I-CAPF) and U.S. Citizens Against Paternity Fraud (US-CAPF).
We the people, must express our
voice and our votes whenever the law is unjust. The purpose of the American Government is to serve the
people, not enslave the people for it's own monetary interests.
What about real change that prevents paternity fraud and stops child support
fraud?
Paternity Network News (PNN):
Men, please take the Paternity Fraud Survey to tell
us about your experience where paternity testing confirmed that you were not the
child's biological father.
The survey results will aid in completing a
national academic study on the impact to non-biological fathers. And assess the services
needed to assist paternity fraud victims and their families.
A national academic project
with Dr Sharon
Squires, PhD in collaboration
with Carnell Smith PfV (Consultant) and others.
Men, click here to take the -->>
Men's Paternity Fraud Survey.
Here's another paternity fraud case that could have been prevented by
a legal DNA paternity test at birth or before the child support order. Frank Hatley
is finally freed from a year in prison for being too poor to pay back money that Georgia spent whenthe child's mother used welfare
services..
Thankfully all of Mr. Hatley's arrears were
erased using the Georgia
paternity fraud law. See the rest of
Hatley's story at ... http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/15/georgia.child.support/
|
Forcing a man to pay for other men's
children that he is not willing to formally
adopt can wreck his life.
It can prevent a man from supporting his own children and family.
In other cases the honest mother is a
married woman who admits her husband is not the
father of her child, yet she is forced to lie by the courts and the child support enforcement agency to claim her
husband is the father. Amazingly, while everyone knows that her is husband is not the father and
he does NOT agree to formally adopt the child.
Why?
ANSWER: The marital presumption of paternity, even when the parties
are separated (legal and non-legal), living across town, across the state and
out-of-the-country.
Best
interest, best lie or best cash
cow?
There seems to be a logical basis in fact for the milkman
statutes. While I do not support a return to 16th century common law where the women and children were chattel, we
cannot allow the continued deception of our opponents to falsely claim that the English common law supported
paternity fraud.
The true Lord Mansfield rule would NEVER cause a man to pay
child support to an adulterous wife because the mother, the child and all property belonged to the
husband. The duped dad would get custody of the child and he would not
surrender any money nor assets to the adulterous wife for having an affair and another man's baby.
Hmmm!
There has to be a flaw in a judicial or administrative
system that rewards a responsible adult for irresponsible behavior.
If this approach is acceptable to anyone with common
sense, there should be no disagreement if women were forced to reward men for doing the same
irresponsible thing. Right?
For example, the husband cheats on his wife, impregnates his mistress and the couple divorces. Then his wife
has to pay him for the other woman's child upon divorce because he wants child support, alimony and the matital
home because the child needs a place to live.
How many of us would say that the scenario described
above is fair and just? And just try telling the ex-wife, it's her fault for not learning about his affair
sooner.
|