Welcome to the US CITIZENS AGAINST PATERNITY FRAUD home page

This website is dedicated to helping Children and Men discover who's the biological father, assisting deceived, scammed and hustled paternity fraud victims to regain their constitutionally protected freedom and their lawful assets. .

PATERNITY NETWORK NEWS™

 

For more... see the MySpace page at www.myspace.com/PaternityFraudExpert

* ANNOUNCING *

INTERNATIONAL Theme Song "REAL LIFE (Sarah's Song)" by Georgia Paternity Fraud victim & songwriter Michael Huff

4LIES & 4TRUTH Talk show™ archives will be coming soon to Blog.PaternityFraud.com LET's PLAY: Who wants to loose $250,000 ?

Father Shopping is no way to Establish Paternity. Did you know that in over 30% of DNA tested paternity cases the man is NOT the father? 

Once the Court has established paternity that man is responsible for paying child support for the next 18 years (or more) -- even if the man is later proven not to be the biological father. This gives a big incentive for a promiscuous female (including married women) to identify the highest earner from among her sexual partners as the father. There is no penalty for a female if she knowingly commits paternity fraud.

Even in cases where the mother and true biological father have later married -- the man originally identified as the father has still been forced to pay child support to that couple for a child that he had nothing to do with. 

When paternity fraud is discovered the Courts frequently cut off the wrongly identified father's contact with the children, yet still require him to pay child support. Child support is no small amount of money -- it can be up to 50%, if not more of a person's net income. Wrongly forcing a man to pay for children he did not father can wreck his life and prevent him from being able to afford to provide for his own family. It is wrong and should be a criminal offense!

In many cases the honest mother is forced to lie by the court or child support agency, why? ANSWER: The marital presumption of paternity, even when the parties are separated. Best interest or best lie? 

The true Lord Mansfield rule would NEVER cause a man to pay child support to an adulterous wife because mother, child and property belonged to the man. The duped dad would get custody of the child, but he would not pay any money to the adulterous wife for having another man's baby. Hmmm!